<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ProMesh Work Item Rss Feed</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ProMesh/WorkItem/List.aspx</link><description>ProMesh Work Item Rss Description</description><item><title>Reopened Issue: Exception when having an overridden virtual method in controller [1606]</title><link>http://promesh.codeplex.com/workitem/1606</link><description>I have a virtual method in my base controller&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;protected virtual string GetFileExt&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;If I override this in my concrete controller, Promesh throws this exception&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;throw new Exception&amp;#40;&amp;#34;More than one method &amp;#34; &amp;#43; methodInfo.Name &amp;#43; &amp;#34;&amp;#40;&amp;#41; was found with the same visibility&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:49:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Reopened Issue: Exception when having an overridden virtual method in controller [1606] 20130612124929A</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Exception when having an overridden virtual method in controller [1606]</title><link>http://promesh.codeplex.com/workitem/1606</link><description>I have a virtual method in my base controller&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;protected virtual string GetFileExt&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;If I override this in my concrete controller, Promesh throws this exception&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;throw new Exception&amp;#40;&amp;#34;More than one method &amp;#34; &amp;#43; methodInfo.Name &amp;#43; &amp;#34;&amp;#40;&amp;#41; was found with the same visibility&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 01:41:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Exception when having an overridden virtual method in controller [1606] 20130515014135A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Integration with SubSonic</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=7168</link><description>Would be great for ProMesh.NET to integrate with SubSonic &amp;#40;or some other ORM&amp;#41; in order to provide higher flexibility in handling the underlying data.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>valeriuz</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:49:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Integration with SubSonic 20090225054929P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Feature: MootoolsProvider</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1326</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve created a MootoolsProvider using the existing AjaxProviders.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#59;ve tested it with Mootools version 1.11 and the testapplication of ProMesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up your excellent work&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Groet,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edwin de Jonge&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: edwindj ** &lt;p&gt;The current MootoolProvider doesn&amp;#39;t work with Mootools 1.2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve created a cleaned up version that does work with Mootools 1.2 &amp;#40;but not with 1.11&amp;#41;.&lt;br /&gt;My code is attached to this comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>edwindj</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:07:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Feature: MootoolsProvider 20080919100712A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: [FormFile] attribute in WebForm</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=6202</link><description>The WebForm lacks a File-control to handle file uploads.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are other ways to handle the file uploads without a File-control, but it would be nice to see all HTML form elements in ProMesh &amp;#58;o&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>NielsR</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:41:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: [FormFile] attribute in WebForm 20080918114124A</guid></item><item><title>Closed Feature: URL attribute on controller methods</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1286</link><description>It would be fantastic to be able to apply the URL attribute to controller methods. This would facilitate friendly URL calls from a single controller. For example, I could have an &amp;#34;employee&amp;#34; controller, and an &amp;#34;add&amp;#34; method. If I could apply the URL attribute, I could make a call to http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;localhost&amp;#47;myapp&amp;#47;employee&amp;#47;add.ashx to add an employee.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:10:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Feature: URL attribute on controller methods 20080726011012P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: FormLabel control</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=941</link><description>Sometime you want to show readonly data that is binded by the webform.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The text could be rendered into a span tag.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ps. this also means that the WebForm should handle readonly properties &amp;#40;with no setter&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#40;copied from the support forum&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: elHosed ** &lt;p&gt;This is easily done just by using ViewData.  Since a readonly property doesn&amp;#39;t need to be validated, filled, etc, only &amp;#34;bound&amp;#34;, ViewData makes sense as the way to handle this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just my take on it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, writing the control is very quick and dirty.  If anyone wants, I can slam it together in 15 minutes and upload it here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>elHosed</author><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:51:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: FormLabel control 20080131045152A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: URL attribute on controller methods</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1286</link><description>It would be fantastic to be able to apply the URL attribute to controller methods. This would facilitate friendly URL calls from a single controller. For example, I could have an &amp;#34;employee&amp;#34; controller, and an &amp;#34;add&amp;#34; method. If I could apply the URL attribute, I could make a call to http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;localhost&amp;#47;myapp&amp;#47;employee&amp;#47;add.ashx to add an employee.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Hosed ** &lt;p&gt;A REST style parsing&amp;#63;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Hosed</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:27:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: URL attribute on controller methods 20071113082758P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Integrated Ajax support</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=785</link><description>Support for calling server methods from javascript, using your choice of javascript framework.&lt;br /&gt;Currently jQuery is working. Other frameworks should be easily supported by plugins.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Moved from deleted structure ProMesh.NET v1.1.0 RC 2</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:13:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Integrated Ajax support 20071026081354A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Template includes</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=843</link><description>Ability to include other templates inside a template.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Proposed syntax&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   &amp;#60;&amp;#33;--&amp;#36;&amp;#91;render filename&amp;#93;--&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;or&lt;br /&gt;   &amp;#60;&amp;#33;--&amp;#36;&amp;#91;include filename&amp;#93;--&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#34;render&amp;#34; will render the template using the template parser. &amp;#34;include&amp;#34; will just import raw HTML, without any processing.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Moved from deleted structure ProMesh.NET v1.1.0 RC 2</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:13:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Template includes 20071026081354A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Change to Support ASP.NET Web Site (Not Just Web Application)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1118</link><description>With a one line chane you should be able to support Web Sites not just Web Applications.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you change Line 97 in WebAppConfig.cs from&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;Type appType &amp;#61; Type.GetType&amp;#40;applicationClassName, false&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;to&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;Type appType &amp;#61; System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetType&amp;#40;applicationClassName, false&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;a user can use ProMesh.Net with a web site that uses the App_Code folder.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This allows you to put your Application class in the App_Code folder and have Promesh.NET find it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is an example config snippet&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;appSettings&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#60;add key&amp;#61;&amp;#34;ProMesh.ApplicationClass&amp;#34; value&amp;#61;&amp;#34;DeviceManager.Application&amp;#34;&amp;#47;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;appSettings&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Notice that I just have to reference the class name with or without namespace and no assembly at the BuildManager finds it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This makes life much easier for those of us who have existing projects build around the Web Site model.  However, users that use the Web Application model should not see any difference.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Not an issue. See support forum for details</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Change to Support ASP.NET Web Site (Not Just Web Application) 20071026074323A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: MootoolsProvider</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1326</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve created a MootoolsProvider using the existing AjaxProviders.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#59;ve tested it with Mootools version 1.11 and the testapplication of ProMesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up your excellent work&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Groet,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edwin de Jonge&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:25:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: MootoolsProvider 20070927082536P</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Release 7776 ValidateField() and FieldValidateHandler Error</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1569</link><description>&amp;#35;1 - Error&lt;br /&gt;No overload for method &amp;#39;ValidateField&amp;#39; takes &amp;#39;0&amp;#39; arguments&lt;br /&gt;ProMesh-7776&amp;#92;FormEngine&amp;#92;WebForm.cs&amp;#9;168&amp;#9;30&amp;#9;Activa.ProMesh&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#35;2 - Error&lt;br /&gt;Delegate &amp;#39;FieldValidateHandler&amp;#39; does not take &amp;#39;3&amp;#39; arguments&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#92;ProMesh-7776&amp;#92;FormEngine&amp;#92;FormField.cs&amp;#9;149&amp;#9;38&amp;#9;Activa.ProMesh&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:25:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Release 7776 ValidateField() and FieldValidateHandler Error 20070927082507P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Changing the template directory at runtime</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1607</link><description>It should be possible to change the template directory for the current request only. Currently, this is an application-wide setting.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:04:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Changing the template directory at runtime 20070927080405P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Exception when having an overridden virtual method in controller</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1606</link><description>I have a virtual method in my base controller&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;protected virtual string GetFileExt&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I override this in my concrete controller, Promesh throws this exception&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;throw new Exception&amp;#40;&amp;#34;More than one method &amp;#34; &amp;#43; methodInfo.Name &amp;#43; &amp;#34;&amp;#40;&amp;#41; was found with the same visibility&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:00:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Exception when having an overridden virtual method in controller 20070927080046P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Release 7776 ValidateField() and FieldValidateHandler Error</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1569</link><description>&amp;#35;1 - Error&lt;br /&gt;No overload for method &amp;#39;ValidateField&amp;#39; takes &amp;#39;0&amp;#39; arguments&lt;br /&gt;ProMesh-7776&amp;#92;FormEngine&amp;#92;WebForm.cs&amp;#9;168&amp;#9;30&amp;#9;Activa.ProMesh&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#35;2 - Error&lt;br /&gt;Delegate &amp;#39;FieldValidateHandler&amp;#39; does not take &amp;#39;3&amp;#39; arguments&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#92;ProMesh-7776&amp;#92;FormEngine&amp;#92;FormField.cs&amp;#9;149&amp;#9;38&amp;#9;Activa.ProMesh&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>montyguy</author><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:55:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Release 7776 ValidateField() and FieldValidateHandler Error 20070925085549P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: MootoolsProvider</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1326</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve created a MootoolsProvider using the existing AjaxProviders.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#59;ve tested it with Mootools version 1.11 and the testapplication of ProMesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up your excellent work&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Groet,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edwin de Jonge&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: activa ** &lt;p&gt;If you don&amp;#39;t mind, I will include it in the 1.1.0 release...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:22:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: MootoolsProvider 20070910032247P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: MootoolsProvider</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1326</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve created a MootoolsProvider using the existing AjaxProviders.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#59;ve tested it with Mootools version 1.11 and the testapplication of ProMesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up your excellent work&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Groet,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edwin de Jonge&lt;br/&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: edwindj ** &lt;p&gt;I forgot to mention that I attached the mootoolsprovider to the issue&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>edwindj</author><pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:09:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: MootoolsProvider 20070908080933A</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: MootoolsProvider</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1326</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve created a MootoolsProvider using the existing AjaxProviders.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#59;ve tested it with Mootools version 1.11 and the testapplication of ProMesh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keep up your excellent work&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Groet,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edwin de Jonge&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>edwindj</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: MootoolsProvider 20070907103316P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: URL attribute on controller methods</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/promesh/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1286</link><description>It would be fantastic to be able to apply the URL attribute to controller methods. This would facilitate friendly URL calls from a single controller. For example, I could have an &amp;#34;employee&amp;#34; controller, and an &amp;#34;add&amp;#34; method. If I could apply the URL attribute, I could make a call to http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;localhost&amp;#47;myapp&amp;#47;employee&amp;#47;add.ashx to add an employee.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>activa</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:39:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: URL attribute on controller methods 20070906053905P</guid></item></channel></rss>